07 Union viewpoint and Rajewal’s adverse viewpoint. about the agricultural bills.

The issue of minimum support price could be fatal for Punjab.

...... friends. Now that the January 4 meeting in Besita has come out, no meaningful outcome is expected in the near future. Case is still pending in the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Supreme Court opened on January 8. The Supreme Court has sought the government's side. This case is likely to be taken up immediately. The farmers have already submitted their case in the first meeting. The government is also presenting its case on every date. Documents from both the parties will be presented in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may dismiss three or one or two bills. But this is unlikely for a number of reasons. As for the minimum support price.

........ friends. The issue of minimum support price could be fatal for Punjab. Why the Hon'ble Supreme Court will not decide that the support price should go to Punjab only. The Supreme Court will not rule that the support price should be given only for wheat. The Hon'ble Supreme Court will not discriminate against any state. It is likely that the Supreme Court will not even consider the matter of support price. If the Supreme Court wants to settle the support price matter, it will be fatal for Punjab. Because with the decision to give support price on all crops, the prices of everything went up overnight. Which proved to be a disaster for the workers, poor farmers and small shopkeepers. For which only the kisan leaders will be guilty. Because they have been asking for support price for 32 crops. The government is also awaiting the decision of the Supreme Court. But Kisan leaders seem to be appalled by the decision. Maybe that's why they are not becoming a party.

So let's see what are the points of the farmer leaders and what are the points of the government. What will be the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court?

Part 6 Union's side and the government's side.

Farmers say that food production, maintenance is on the state list of the constitution. The Center cannot interfere in this.

The government says the grain is with the Interstate Trade Center. Of course, the state has wheat and paddy grains, but the center has the right to flour and rice. The center has the authority over the essentials. It is important to promote the grain as it has an interstate sales center. Therefore, in order to reduce the cost of transportation, electronic marketing is essential to bring speed and transparency in business. One Nation One Market is essential to promote import and export. .

....... Farmers say that the government has a bad feeling behind bringing the bill in Corona. She wants to hand over the food business to Adani Ambani.

The government says rice is India's main crop. In order to reap the full benefits of the raft crop, it has become necessary to enact laws immediately. Two laws pertaining to electronic marketing and One Nation One Market. There are many benefits associated with this.

Farmers' unions say that these laws have been made by Modi Sahib for the benefit of his special men.

The government says the law is the product of the Manmohan Singh government. The Congress manifesto promises to make these laws. This need has been felt since 2003. The National Survey was conducted in 2014-15. According to his report, these reforms are so necessary that even if the state does not agree in spite of persuasion, the Center should exercise its authority to enforce these laws. The government argues that where the distribution of rights creates confusion, the relevant item is included in the concurrent list. The Manmohan Singh government also held several meetings and seminars to bring such a bill.

Unions say that Punjab has its own Dedicated Contract Act 2013 and 2018, the Center has no right to impose new laws.

The government says Punjab law does not exist anywhere. The Punjab government could not enforce the law. It has failed to protect the farmers. That is why central law is necessary. The Government identifies the Electronic Agricultural Market, Unified Market, One Nation One Market, and Inter State Free Market, Subsidi Less Market as per the requirements of International Market, World Trade Organization, Food and Supply of UNO.

While the union says that this law was not demanded by the farmers, the farmer does not need it. So these bills are wrong and unnecessary. The government has accepted the amendments. Therefore, it has been proven that the laws are wrong.

The government says that we have asked which section is wrong. Explain how to modify. But the leaders of 31 unions could not point out a single item. Nor could it change any item. That is why all laws are flawed.

The unions say that millions of farmers have gathered here. Therefore, the government should withdraw all the three bills.

The government says the crores that agree with the bills. This proves that this bill is accepted by the farmers of India and is considered beneficial. Farmers have nothing to do with the Essential Commodities Improvement Bill. This bill relates to merchants. This is not a farmer issue, it is a political issue.

In fact, the issue is so complicated that even the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not consider it appropriate to take an immediate decision. Left on arbitration. Due to which the struggle can last for months and even years. It can also take the form of internal warfare. Let the people decide for themselves who is right and who is wrong.