Thank you very much for visiting the Anti-Corruption Party's website. This party has been established to fight against evils like corruption, drug mafias, sand mafia, monopoly on transport cable industry, etc. The money looted from the public goes back to the public. The Gurdwara Board and other holy Gurudwaras will be looted. The Gurdwara Parbandhak Board will be formed all over the world to manage the board. Notified and local committees will be managed by the local Sangat. Your cooperation is required.
        
 

A08. REGARDING WATER SHARING, HOW DID IT HAPPEN WITH PUNJAB?

How did the Central Governments continue to be hostile to Punjab and how did the Punjab Leaders continue to be loyal to Punjab and the farmers for the happiness of the Center.

Note 1: 2011, NASA says Punjab will be barren for 20 years due to water scarcity

Note 2: Kiosk is used to measure water discharge at water source. Kiosk means one cubic foot of water discharge per second. One cubic foot contains 28.32 liters of water. More than one lakh liters of water flowing per hour. One cusec irrigates about 20 acres of land per day.

Note 3: Water is measured in this way to indicate water consumption. One acre, one foot of water in a reservoir, is called one acre of water. One acre of water can irrigate about 10 acres of land.

Note 4: There were actually 6 rivers in undivided Punjab. Sutlej, Beas, Ravi, Chenab, Jhelum and Sindh.

Before independence, Agraj had divided the Indian states according to his needs. Which was given the name of Residency or Agency. Khairpur was the only state in the Sindh Agency. While Punjab Agency had 15 states. At the time of independence, the British gave the heads of state the right to choose between Pakistan, India, to remain independent. Out of the Punjab agency, only the state of Bahawalpur chose to stay with Pak. The remaining 14 states chose to stay with India. The states living with India were: Faridkot, Kapurthala, Malerkotla, Nabha, Patiala, Bilaspur, Kangra, Mandi, Sirmaur, Sket, Tehri, Jind, Kalsia and Loharu.

(India's five states of Junagadh, Hyderabad, Bilaspur, Bhopal, Travancore, remained independent at the time they were later annexed to India. The Hindu king of the Muslim-majority state of Kashmir chose to stay with India.)

At that time there were two main sources of water for irrigation in northern India. Which were called besan. Indus Basin and Ganges Basin. The Indus Basin included six rivers of the Punjab and the Ganga Basin the Ganga Jamna. In the state from which the rivers flowed for irrigation. They were considered part of the same basin. Meaning they were entitled to the same water. The first 11 states of the Indian Punjab Agency drew water from the Indus Basin (Sutlej, Ravi, Beas, Chenab, Jhelum and Sindh). While the last three states like Jid, Kalshi, Loharu etc. used to take water from Ganga Beshan i.e. Jamna river.

According to the Indus Water Treaty, West Punjab will use water from Chenab, Jhelum and Indus rivers. East Punjab can use the entire water of Sutlej Beas Ravi three rivers. An unjustified argument of Pak: Because the state of Bahawalpur which used to get water from Ravi has become deprived of its own water. India, ie the eastern states, should pay compensation for the construction of new canals to draw water from the Chenab river. That amount was set at ਉਸ 60 million at the time. The eastern states, especially those with canal irrigation at that time, were only five. That means Faridkot, Kapurthala, Malerkotla, Nabha, Patiala, the area of ​​the states in Punjab.

India did not pay the huge sum of 6 60 million. Instead, after the inspiration and demand of Punjabis, USA, Canada, England, New Zealand were given by many countries. It is clear from this fact that Punjab alone is the sole owner of Sutlej, Beas and Ravi waters. However, Himachal and Kashmir also have ownership rights. But they don't need any more water. Haryana, (Jind Kalsian Loharu) Delhi, Rajasthan has no claim on Punjab's water. Because they used to take water from the Yamuna. The Riparian principle does not apply to Punjab. Punjab is the sole owner.

Riparian means one who lives by the water's edge. In Europe, for example, high and low places are irrigated by sprinklers or lift pumps. Water is scarce, demand is high. There the water is distributed according to the Riparian Law. Whichever side of the water, or the area of ​​the village or city, has been irrigated from this source in the past. Water should be distributed according to the same ratio.

But in this case at the time of Indo Water Treaty 1961 only five states of Punjab Faridkot, Kapurthala, Malerkotla, Nabha, Patiala were using water from Indus Basin. At that time the present Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan were not using the water of Indus Basin as free property. Bikaner State and some districts of present day Haryana used to get water from Punjab. In return he paid four annas per crop per acre. This is living proof that Punjab is the sole owner of water from the Indus Basin. No other stakeholders. Therefore, the Riparian principle does not apply at all.

Punjab could not use even one per cent of its water. Out of 304 lakh acres of water, only 34 lakh acres could be used. All the water is going to Pak. He has taken 6 6 crore, which is equivalent to Rs 6,000 crore today, and is also using water. Why? There are many reasons for this. Centre's hostile policy towards Punjab. Selfish looting by Punjab leaders. Absence of a truly honest Punjab friendly government.

Punjab's leaders have perpetrated atrocities on Punjab by adopting Riparian doctrine. The leaders of Punjab took out a loan of about Rs 100 crore and got it in their pockets. But after spending a few crores, the water of Ravi could not stop even the water of Sutlej.

ACP promises Punjabis that ACP government will fully utilize Sutlej Beas and Ravi water. ACP is able to manage the funds for this project. Canal water will be normal. Farming costs will go down. Bore motors will become meaningless. Electricity will be normal. Punjab will be able to sell its water to Rajasthan. The Punjab Government will take legislative action on the pending appeal from November 25, 1983 to be heard by the Supreme Court.

To prove the above fact, I am giving a brief history of the waters of Punjab. By reading it, the consciousness of every intelligent Punjabi will be awakened.

In 1900, Bikaner was an independent state. Which was ruled by Maharaja Ganga Singh. Ganga Singh had approached the British government to get water from Bikaner from Punjab. Ganga Singh had approached the British government to supply water to Bikaner from the Sutlej river in the Punjab. The Bikaner government will compensate the Punjab government for this water. The Bikaner government will pay the price of land under the canal in Punjab to Punjab. The cost of the canal will be borne by the Bikaner government. Raja Ganga Singh ruled Bikaner from 1887 to 1943.

In 2006, the Bikaner government made this request to the Viceroy of India.

On September 4, 1920, an agreement was reached to build the Ganges Canal. Which would be diverted from the Sutlej from Dhussainiwala and supply 2720 cusecs of water to Bikaner.

On October 26, 1927, the canal was completed. It was inaugurated by Lord Irban. It was called Ganga Canal due to the construction of Raja Ganga Singh.

On January 1, 1928, the canal water started flowing completely and the Bikaner government started paying compensation of 4 annas per acre to the Punjab government. As the state of Haryana was giving earlier. The state of Bikaner was later incorporated into Rajasthan. But Punjab continued to get water. Which was closed after independence.

The states in PEPSU also paid compensation.

(Many veterans may be confused about the Punjab and Pepsu area at that time. According to my research, Punjab is the part which was under Agraj. Pepsu included many states of Haryana besides the existing states of Punjab.) All these PEPSU states were compensating the Punjab ie the British government)

August 15, 1947. After independence, there was a rift between India and Pakistan over the distribution of water. Both armies came to the border. The big countries got involved and appointed the World Bank as an arbitrator. The bank has visited both the countries several times.

At that time water was considered to be the two main basins. Indus Basin and Ganga Basin. The rivers of the Punjab were in the Indus Basin and the Jamna etc. were counted in the Ganges Basin. The Indus Basin had the capacity to supply 1734 lakh acre feet of water. The Ganga Basin has a water capacity of 4460 lakh acre feet. But only 3 million acre feet of water from the Ganga Basin is being used by many states in India. Everything else falls into the ocean.

When the major countries hired the World Bank to settle the water dispute after the Indo-Pak partition, India claimed Rajasthan, Pepsu and Bikaner as part of the Indus Basin to get a bigger share of water from the World Bank. In fact, they were part of the Ganga Bashan. Rajasthan, Bikaner and Pepsu cannot become riparians of Punjab. Because they were part of the second Ganga Beshan. Present-day Haryana was also part of the Ganges Basin. Even at the time of united Punjab, only five states of Punjab Faridkot, Kapurthala, Malerkotla, Nabha, Patiala were using Indus Basin water. Although compensation was given. Water came to the landlocked states of Haryana from the river Jamuna. Which is the river of Ganga Beshan.

Punjab actually has only 34 lakh acre feet of water. Out of which Punjab is using 1.5 million acre feet of water and the rest is going to other states. Which is being forced by the central government

Out of the 1.5 million acre feet of Punjab, plans are being made to divert more water from Punjab by raising the banks of Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal, Hansi Watana Canal and Bhakra. These projects are considered as a step taken by the Badal government towards the farmers of Punjab.

During the partition of August 15, 1947, Harike Headworks began to be built. In order to supply water to the present Haryana area, construction of 18500 cusec feet water supply gates (moghes) was started.

On September 25, 1950, the Bhakra Control Board and the Bhakra Advisory Board were constituted. Through which the Bhakra Dam of Punjab was taken over by the Center. No representative of Punjab has been taken in this board. Earlier it was under the control of Punjab.

On January 28, 1955, the Department of Irrigation of the Government of India convened a meeting before the World Bank's visit, in which the waters of the five states (Punjab, Rajasthan, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir) were allegedly divided. It was also noted that in case of shortage, the quota in Kashmir would not change. Article 5 of the same agreement states that the price of water will be fixed separately. But now the central government has backed down. It is clear that up to that time Punjab was considered the sole owner of water.

In 1955, water was sent from Bhakra Dam to Rajasthan. But Punjab did not get any price for it. 18500 cusecs of water is going to Rajasthan from Harike headworks. This means that 5,23,864 liters of water is being looted every second.

Guess for yourself how much water has gone down since 1955. But Badal was saying that he would not give a drop of Punjab water to anyone. The same is going to Haryana and Badal is refusing to do the same. Only 20% of Punjab's water requirement comes from canal water. The remaining 80% is being pumped out through tubewells which is reducing the water label.

1960 19 December Indus Water Treaty: Pakistan

An Indo-Pak treaty was reached in the city of Karachi, India, through the mediation of World Bank officials. It was attended by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru from India and Field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan from Pakistan. This is called the Indus Water Treaty. According to which, India had to pay 60 million pounds (actually 620,60,000 pounds) to Pakistan. In return all the water of Ravi Beas Sutlej was to be used by India.

This amount was to be paid by India in ten installments over ten years. Only after paying the full installments did India have the right to stop the flow of water from these three rivers Sutlej, Beas and Ravi to Pakistan. India has not paid a single penny from its coffers. All this money was donated by Punjabi expatriates and the countries where Punjabi expatriates lived. It is clear that the water of the three rivers, Sutlej, Beas and Ravi has been bought by the Punjabi diaspora from Pakistan with the blessings of the donor countries. It is owned by the people of Punjab. The Government of India has no right to it.

The notification of the Indus Water Treaty states that India can use all the water of the Sutlej Beas Ravi after March 31, 1970. The Government of India has failed to utilize any part of this water. Instead, Punjab's water is being plundered to meet the needs of Haryana, Delhi and Rajasthan. Punjab has become poor.

If the Government of India had used all the water of the three rivers Sutlej Beas Ravi as per the Indus-Water Treaty, Punjab would be truly California today. Now almost all the water of these three rivers is flowing into Pak. The Center remains the enemy of Punjab due to its internal policy.

Indus-Water Treaty In 1960, from the Indus Basin, the Indian states were allotted a total of 158 lakh acres of water. This is how the water was distributed. Punjab 72 lakh acre feet, Rajasthan 80 lakh acre feet, Jammu and Kashmir 6.5 lakh acre feet. This does not include Delhi. But now the Union government is forcibly taking away Punjab's water and giving it to Delhi and Haryana.

The huge amount of more than 60 million pounds was paid by countries like USA, Canada, England and New Zealand due to India's inability to pay.

According to the Indo-Pak partition, 3 out of 6 rivers were divided into Sutlej, Beas, Ravi and India. The three had a water capacity of only 304 lakh acres. The three Pak rivers had a storage capacity of 1430 lakh acre feet.

On November 1, 1966, Punjabi became a state and Haryana came into being. Due to this structure the Punjab Reorganization Act came into being. Under Sections 78 and 79 of which the water of Punjab came under the control of the Center.

Under Section 78, Bhakra, Nangal and Beas dams were taken under the control of the Center. As per Article 79, the Center will set up a Bhakra Control Board. Earlier, it was on the state list and was in the possession of the Punjab. Water was registered in the state list. Under Section 80, the Beas project was taken over by the Center.

Article 262 of the Constitution prevents the Supreme Court from intervening in water matters. If there is an interstate dispute, it is decided by the tribunal, which is nominated by the Center. Punjab is the sole owner of water. Therefore, no tribunal can be set up in this regard.

As per the 1966 partition, all the properties were distributed according to the 60:40 ratio. The western part of the Punjab was divided by this ratio. But the water of the Yamuna flowing in the eastern part, which supplied water to the Jind Kalshis etc. area, was not counted for this distribution.

March 24, 1976: Water is then distributed by the Prime Minister. In which Haryana was given 35 lakh acre feet of water. Delhi and other states were also given water according to the new distribution.

On November 16, 1976, during the tenure of Giani Zail Singh, the Haryana Government had sent Rs. 1 crore to the Punjab Government for acquisition of land and commencement of canal excavation. But Giani ji did not take any action.

In 1977, when Badal Sahib was the Chief Minister, he demanded Rs. 3 crore from the Haryana Government for canal digging through letter No. 78/23/6/17. But the Haryana government had sent only one crore.

It was decided by Badal Sahib, in a large gathering, to start the excavation at the Punjab-Haryana border with gold. But due to the opposition of Tohra Sahib, it had to be canceled.

The Prime Minister's Water Award, dated March 24, 1976, was challenged by Haryana in the Supreme Court. Against which Punjab had also filed a separate case in the Supreme Court.

Another meeting was held on October 3, 1977, which was attended by five Chief Ministers. The issue of hydropower was raised at the meeting. Apart from Murarji Desai, Prime Minister, Surjit Singh Barnala, Union Minister, Parkash Singh Badal, Chief Minister of Punjab, Balbant Singh, Finance Minister of Punjab, Bhairon Singh Sekhawat, Shata Kumar, Virender Singh, besides the representative of Kashmir.

February 20, 1978: Badal Government issued Notification 113/5 and 121/5 for acquisition of land for Sutlej Yamna Canal. Haryana was ruled by Devi Lal at that time.

In 1980, Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister again. Indira Gandhi pressured Chief Minister Darbara Singh to withdraw the case from the Supreme Court. Darbara Singh's resignation was also demanded.

An agreement was reached on December 31, 1981, which included Indira Gandhi, Darbara Singh, Bhajan Lal, Shivcharan Mathur, the Chief Minister of Rajasthan. It was dishonest that the amount of water was shown to be more than 175 lakh acre feet. The distribution of water under the agreement was as follows. Punjab 42 lakh acre feet, Haryana 39 lakh acre feet, Rajasthan 86 lakh acre feet, Jammu and Kashmir 6.5 lakh acre feet, Delhi 2 lakh acre feet.

In 1983, the farmers of Bathida and Faridkot filed a writ petition in the Punjab High Court. In which giving water to other states was declared unconstitutional. May Ra also had some contribution in this. The writ petition was heard by Chief Justice Shandhawalia on Friday, November 25, 1983. However, the following Monday, Shadhwalia Sahib was transferred to the Patna High Court and the case was taken up by the Supreme Court. The action of the Supreme Court was declared unconstitutional. Because this case was not interstate. Nor did the case fall under the category of opposing judgment by two benches. Not a single case has been heard since then.

1983, November The canal construction directives were also issued by the Center till December 1984. The total expenditure of the Center was fixed at Rs. 204.30 crore. At that time Dharamyudh Morcha was in operation in Punjab. Therefore, this period was extended to December 1986.

On July 24, 1985, Rajiv Longowal reached an agreement. At that time Punjab was a governorate. Although the agreement was signed by Longowal, it is called the Rajiv Longowal Agreement. In fact, it was a Rajiv-Badal pact. I have personal information about this. The ninth item of the agreement was related to water. Under which the formation of the tribunal was considered. The tribunal will report within six months. It was also agreed under the agreement that the canal would be completed by August 15, 1986.

An ordinance to make the tribunal was issued on January 24, 1986. Earlier, Justice B Bala was a member of the Irandi Tribunal. However, on April 2, 1986, it was renamed the Ravi Beas Tribunal. Justice AS Ahmadi of Gujarat High Court and Justice PC Bala Krishnan of Kerala High Court were nominated. This tribunal is known as the Iradi Tribunal.

The Iradi Commission has increased the water of Punjab to 1720 lakh acre feet. In reality, the water was only 1.49 million acre feet.

1986, December. With the Haryana Assembly elections coming up, Rajiv Gandhi announced that the Sutlej-Yamna canal would be completed by December 1987.

The report of the Iradi Commission was prepared on January 30, 1987. Which was sent to the concerned parties in May. This showed that the water of both Punjab and Haryana has increased.

1990, July 23: Construction of canal started by the Center. But despite an ultimatum from the Babar Khalsa not to stop work on the canal, it was attacked. Two engineers and 30 workers were killed. Due to which the work was stopped, which remained closed for about ten years.

On January 15, 2002, the Supreme Court directed the Central Government to start excavation of the canal.

On June 4, 2004, the Supreme Court again directed the Center to bring the canal under its control. The Center and Punjab were asked to provide adequate security. The Punjab government was asked to hand over the canal land to the Center within a month and a half..

On July 12, 2004, instead of handing over the Punjab land to the Center, Captain Sahib passed the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 in the Punjab Vidhan Sabha. With this, all the agreements after 1986 were revoked, but a section 5 of the Act, "Protection of Existing Judges", was passed to justify the water going to other states first.

In fact, it was a great betrayal of the Punjab. Because after 1986 there was no compromise. The issue of water sharing was raised in 1966 at the time of Punjab-Haryana partition. In 1987,only the report of the Iradi Commission was sent to the Punjab Vidhan Sabha. All the decisions that were made before 1986 were personal. No decision was taken by the Punjab government. The decision taken by the government is to bring the agenda in the Vidhan Sabha and pass it after debate. Any decision that is not passed in the Vidhan Sabha is not mandatory for any state. Whether it was done by the Chief Minister or by the President of the ruling party.

This resolution of Captain Sahib gave legal form to all personal decisions regarding river waters. Legal sanctioned medicine from Punjab. Everybody gave legal form to past decisions regarding river waters. As a result, Punjab has accepted all the earlier decisions and there is no point left in the Supreme Court today.That is why the Governor approved it within an hour and sent it to the Center to give legal form to all personal decisions regarding the waters. As a result, Punjab has accepted all the earlier decisions and there is no point left in the Supreme Court today.

On July 22, 2004, Haryana appealed to the Center against which the Central Government had made a Presidential Reference under Article 143 of the Constitution and sent it to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The sole purpose of the resolution was to have no effect on the decisions of the Iradi Commission and the Supreme Court.

During the Assembly elections in February 2007, Parkash Singh Badal announced that if an Akali government was formed, he would immediately repeal Article Five. But no action was taken to form a government and forge a partnership with Manmohan Singh. In fact,the Shiromani Committee with a budget of Rs 100 crore was handed over to a relative of Manmohan Singh.

On September 27, 2011, in another case in Himachal Pradesh, the apex court ruled that the Beas project was in Himachal Pradesh. He was not given as much power as he was supposed to. Therefore, the Himachal government is entitled to about Rs 2,200 crore in compensation. The interest on this amount will be different. The alternative is to give total power, including penalties to Himachal. Clearly obvious

How much power shortage is going to happen in Punjab. Badal Captain and Kejriwal who are aspiring for the crown of Punjab. They are looting Punjab's water for their personal gain..

Badal Sahib, fooling the people of Punjab, is saying every day, both father and son, that they have to make any sacrifice.They will not give even a drop of Punjab's water to any other state. While 86 lakh acres of water is going to Rajasthan every year through Bhakra canal. 59 lakh acre feet of water is going to Haryana from Bhakra Main Canal through Narwana Branch Canal. He was never mentioned in any way.

The Badal government has broken all the boundaries of ambushing Punjab and Punjab farmers for its own benefit. Even now on April 30, 2016, they have started supplying another 450 cusecs of water to Haryana through Barbala canal.

The first 1000 cusecs of water was going to Haryana from Punjab through Barbala Link Canal. Which has now been increased to 1450 cusecs. For which the banks of Bhakra in Sanori area have been raised one and half feet. About which Punjab has already received Rs. 370 lakh from Haryana and another Rs. 95 lakh is to be received.How much Punjab will be affected by this increased 450 cusecs of water can be estimated from this. This will transport about 6 billion liters of water to Haryana in an hour. While Badal Sahib is talking about not giving a drop.

Out of about one crore cultivable area of ​​Punjab, only 20 lakh acres are under canal irrigation. Now with this new royal gift millions more acres will be barren. In the case of water where Badal Sahib has sided with Punjab. There, Kejriwal has also sided with Punjab. Kejriwal had pledged allegiance to Punjab in the holy land of Muktsar.

Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. This will transport about 6 billion liters of water to Haryana in an hour. While Badal Sahib is talking about not giving a drop.

Out of about one crore cultivable area of ​​Punjab, only 20 lakh acres are under canal irrigation. Now with this new royal gift millions more acres will be barren. In the case of water where Badal Sahib has sided with Punjab. There, Kejriwal has also sided with Punjab. Kejriwal had pledged allegiance to Punjab in the holy land of Muktsar.

Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. P5This will transport about 6 billion liters of water to Haryana in an hour. While Badal Sahib is talking about not giving a drop.

Out of about one crore cultivable area of ​​Punjab, only 20 lakh acres are under canal irrigation. Now with this new royal gift millions more acres will be barren. In the case of water where Badal Sahib has sided with Punjab. There, Kejriwal has also sided with Punjab. Kejriwal had pledged allegiance to Punjab in the holy land of Muktsar.

Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. P5only 20 lakh acres are under canal irrigation. Now with this new royal gift millions more acres will be barren. In the case of water where Badal Sahib has sided with Punjab. There, Kejriwal has also sided with Punjab. Kejriwal had pledged allegiance to Punjab in the holy land of Muktsar.

Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. P5only 20 lakh acres are under canal irrigation. Now with this new royal gift millions more acres will be barren. In the case of water where Badal Sahib has sided with Punjab. There, Kejriwal has also sided with Punjab. Kejriwal had pledged allegiance to Punjab in the holy land of Muktsar.

Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. P5Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit. P5Captain Sahib's "Presidential Reference" on the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was in the Supreme Court. Haryana's application is now being heard. In the matter of water sharing, because Delhi is also a party. So he was asked to give his affidavit.

The Kejriwal government took an affidavit against Punjab saying that the Punjab government had no right to pass the act. But to fool the people of Punjab, Sanjay Singh made the statement that the lawyer had made the statement without meeting the head of the water board. Which will be withdrawn. I even wrote an article in detail at that time that Sanjay considers Punjabis as ignorant and desolate.

The Kejriwal government has argued that the affidavit was withdrawn without our consent. However, the lawyer submitted his affidavit and power of attorney prepared by the Kejriwal government before the court.

Now the situation was that if Kejriwal's case was accepted by the court, then the lawyer was punishable for misleading the court. If the lawyer's papers are to be believed, then the Kejriwal government is to blame for misleading the court.

Finally, the Kejriwal government petitioned the court that we have settled the dispute with our lawyer by resigning out of court. Now let our side be considered the same as that given by our authorized lawyer earlier. But here in Punjab, Sanjay and AAP are lying to the Punjabis that Kejriwal has withdrawn his first affidavit and filed a petition in favor of a new Punjab.